Site Title

Understanding the System of Deception in Tasmania.

By Gordon Bell

First published 18/2/2026

[Update 25/3/2026. See the end of chapter 1, Marita O’connell

+ update 6/4/2026]

1

The Tasmanian Government is mostly a psychological operation today. The politics are not as real as they seem to most, and your representative against all government corruption, the Tasmanian Ombudsman is not functionally real at all—as I will prove by describing my personal experiences. Experiences involving many members of government, including the Police Commissioner, the Governor General, the then leader of the opposition party Rebecca White, the Premier Jeremy Rockliff, and the Committee on Integrity.

In Tasmanian, as in all Australian states and Commonwealth countries,  if you have a problem with the government, no matter in the form of your public school, public transport, council, senate, or parliamentary officers, and much else –though not ministers who may  ignore you— you have just one single avenue to go down. This avenue is called ‘the Ombudsman’, which is supposedly an office of lawyers under his command who take your complaint and arbitrate. If you find that they are criminally fraudulent, which you will [I have dealt with them 4 times], you might assume you can complain to the Governor General, bringing forth your evidence. For according to “our” laws and statues, it is she/he, a representative of the British monarchy, who appoints the Ombudsman. Yet the Ombudsman is not answerable to the Governor General. She has “no role”, as she—now Barbara Baker– told me. The Ombudsman, we are told, “is answerable to parliament”.

Do you see the problem? It means that if you have a problem with the government, you can complain to the Ombudsman. And if you have a problem with the Ombudsman—which you will have— you can complain to, the government. The government pay the Ombudsman, the Ombudsman protects the government, protects the money. And all the words the ombudsman co. send you are twisted legalese and pretence. Always sidestepping any important and direct question or evidence you might have. While the government may either pretend to answer or just ignore you. As we will see.

So you have nowhere to go. Compartmentalised you can do nothing. If you think the media will help out, then you don’t know Tasmania, you don’t know this government class. This intertwining of old families that go back to the beginning, and all support and appoint each other to the highest positions in all roles of consequence. All this I will discuss with evidence. But we will start with media, seeing how an invisible governing works as media to manipulate the thinking of the people. The government of Tasmania is now largely a media phenomenon, a phenomena of psychological manipulation. Acting on data about human populations and perception that has been collected around the world now for well over a century. After that we will meet the Ombudsman, and the rest.

Here below are three Tasmanian women involved with Tasmanian culture, who also separately hold powerful and discrete positions in government or academia. All these cases found me, I didn’t go looking for them. The absurdity of them caused me to investigate. And there is much much more to find, which I have found, for those suspicious enough to pay attention to this methodology.

1] Marita O’connell

This woman appeared in an ABC article with her all-female family after her husband died. They were, according to her “touched by terrible death” being that “its unusual for someone to die so young and with young children”. The article is still up and free for reading.  Everything I write below was gleaned from the article, apart from finding out what Marita does for a living, and an historic photo and comment that are relevant— and also freely available online. For the record, I wish this family well. I wish them all the privacy and security they need. Except for Marita O’Connell who needs to come to trial.

Here they are, Marita, her two daughters and her mother-in-law.

Take a good look at this photo. It will be discussed below.

We read that the husband/father died nine years previously of a brain tumor on the youngest daughter’s 5th birthday. The girl, here 14, says “When we had the funeral, I couldn’t really remember it”, and they are about to have a type of memorial, a public one.  The suggestion being that this will make up for her lack of memory—however that works. To remember the funeral will help her remember the father. This might also explain why Marita kept the ashes in a cupboard in the hallway for the ensuing nine years, waiting for the girl to grow up. The older the girl becomes, the more she will remember the funeral, the man. And the ashes are suggestive of a funeral. So goes the logic.

But there’s a problem. The ashes making them remember the man/funeral are also making them remember he is dead. Which they don’t like. Marita says;

“We never put them in an urn or anything because it was just too shocking and too much. So I just kept putting it off.”

If the ashes were a bad thing, why keep putting off getting them out of the house? Why take them home? And if they are too shocking for the mother, what will they be for the girl?

Marita also said about the death “its not like it goes away”. That’s a rather ironic thing to say, isn’t it?  It doesn’t go away with the one thing that will ensure it never goes away there in the home, endlessly.  Endlessly, I say because the solution she decided upon after nine years, was a new thing in history entire. Something no one could have ever anticipated. Including the deceased. The blasting of ashes into the sky at a public event, Dark Mofo, as fireworks. [See Miles Mathis’ article on Dark Mofo here].

So we have the chance for public grieving at an event sponsored by all the major Tasmanian corporations. An event the government class are making their fortunes from. An event they call on their government website “a heady few days” [i.e lots of drinking]. Or at least did so a few years ago. An event hitherto criticized for not being family friendly. Being a drinking event extension of MONA the museum of sex and death. Death, sex and drinking, now becoming family friendly. And this change of direction/tricks has worked, apparently. My research on Reddit.com found a lot of repeat attendees commenting on the festivals change over the years. How they noticed a lot more children at the events in recent times. In fact they invented at least one event there just for children.

And so its public grieving, but they don’t dare use that term. To Marita its as much about life as death. Yes. And you can’t find much that isn’t under the topic of life and death. To blast the ashes into the sky as fireworks in a public event so the girl can “connect”with the funeral that she had forgotten, fits in somewhere. That is all they are saying. The how of this happening is anyone’s guess. Even the organiser of this “memorial” is not making sense. Well, how could he? Calling it “epic minimalism”, as if that wasn’t a paradox. How can a memorial be minimal? How deeply can you think in a few seconds of a single firework? One he boasts is the loudest noise legally allowed in Australia. In fact the actual man being memorialized is hardly mentioned in the article. But when he is mentioned, only once, by Marita, she says he was “an action man” who “loved MONA”. There is lots of action in fireworks, right? The festival is run out of MONA. So we can see the connection. And, to top it off, Marita says life is explosive. And its all as much about life as well as death, remember. It all makes sense, in a type of rolling drunken way.

But there is a little problem still. This festival identifies yearly with an upside down cross. The organizers themselves go out of their way to make this connection between a Christian cross being an upside down one. And we also know it because they erect it less than 500 metres from the isolated, most prominent, extremely prominent, and nearly singular christian cross in the city, which is the very same type, a red electric one. The original standing high on an obelisk at the War memorial. Its like erecting an upside down cross in a graveyard and claiming its only art.

Furthermore, the man’s name, as with his mother, are decidedly Christian names; Justin [as in St Justin, and the emperor Justinian I] and Christine. To call it bad taste is a bit of an understatement. And did he have any relatives who died in the many wars? They would be the young girl’s relatives too. So they are asking, or actually ensuring this young girl discounts 99% of the population in her world-view, her love for her father— whether he really died or not. She, of course is in the 1%, the peerage, which I have confirmed.

And so why is this one daughter such a focus? She is wearing colour, lots of it, and in fact all of it. And it is bold colour on black, her black and the family’s black. Like fireworks in a night sky. She is quoted while the other sister and grandmother are not. Her skin is unusually white and her hair is unusually black, compared to mother and daughter.  She is holding a dog, which makes the very focal point centre of the family photo. Clearly they are saying that the fact the father died on her birthday makes her particularly relevant. But really, to single out one family member concerning a death is to alienate them. If the death were real this would be troubling. You don’t give a memorial to someone as an event also to one particular person at the same time. That is against the principal of a memorial. The celebrations of a universal love the deceased had. This girl, we are told has just spent nine years with the ashes of someone who died on her 5th birthday, now they are apparently taking it to the next level.

So the upside down cross is just art. We are not here to think about where Justin’s soul might be. Just here to think about the family and the girl. Are Justin’s ashes just art too? Well, actually, Marita says as much;

 Even though it’ll only be Justin’s ashes going up there, lots of people will be reflecting as well.

Why so confident?

Says the girl;

“When we had the funeral I couldn’t really remember it, so it’s nice actually getting to think about that…”

There is nothing like fireworks to help you think straight about it and that.  

Suspicious, I went and looked at what was going on at the actual time of death of this man, now 13 years ago. And, in another first for me, I read at MyTributes.com this comment from someone actually making a joke about his death. [*21/03/26; This has now been taken down. Within month after publishing this article.]. See what you think;

In Lieu of flowers please vote Labour {after all, he will be watching!}

Something is very, very wrong with all of this.

Now explain this one;

This is Beatrix Potter, the famous writer, and the only Beatrix you know of or have heard of. I say this because the name is extremely rare today, and was rare in her day too. [Probably because of the ‘betray kiss’ resonation in some foreign accents. And it should really be pronounced ‘Bee a trix’ ]. And it is the same name as this young daughter. A name that at the time of the daughter’s birth, didn’t even register–so less than 1 in 10 000.  And they are the same age, but for a year, and holding the same type of dog.

The photo above is from Wikipedia, and the caption reads;

Potter aged fifteen with her springer spaniel, Spot

Springer Spaniels.

These are impossible odds. So what is going on? Well, I can think of only two possibilities. You can decide which is worse;

1] Marita is mocking the grieving process of the family either deliberately or in pig-headed vulgarity.

2] The man didn’t die, he faked his death, and Marita and her class are mocking the public. With a new go at mocking Christianity. And getting sympathy for nothing. And advertising for the festival as a family event par excellence.

As this man’s father is listed in the peerage as “unknown” + SURNAME — [I am not going to give out the surname, out of respect for the child [now adult], who is clearly innocent and deserves privacy. Her surname is not the same as her mother’s]—he is listed as living in Lenah Valley. How could they know his surname, address and relatives, and not his first name!? Meaning they are hiding who this man was, as they do often for those involved in intelligence work.

I happen to know the girl’s hair is naturally blond. So I ask you; do you see that child dying her hair black? I don’t. Go have a look at her face. Do you see attitude there? Someone out to make statements?  She is baby-faced and compliant. She gets a puppy now, after all.

Here is what the girl said, or supposedly said in full;

“When we had the funeral, I couldn’t really remember it, so it’s nice actually getting to think about that and actually getting to connect with it and realize what is happening and just appreciate it.”

This is a strange mixing of tenses. The past, present and future all in a blur. Is she in the process of realising? No, it is worded to say that this is a given. That it is definitively what is going to happen. Just like Marita’s confidence that many people will be reflecting. Marita also says;

“Its going to be explosive and beautiful and glorious, and that’s what life is.”

Very confident again on how it will be, isn’t she?

If the girl had worded it correctly, we would see the necessary technical possibility of failure. Because it would be.

“It will be nice if I understand what is happening and appreciate it”. Or, “I am sure I will understand…”

There is not the concrete certainty in correct grammar, because of course the event is yet to happen. But they have added a line in the article so you further accept that this pre-event moment, is also part of the event. Marita says she thinks about her husband’s passing and they are “not used to doing it in public”. As if it has already all begun, and it will be beautiful, glorious, explosive. That is what life is. In other words we are all included. It is an all-consuming writing style.

So then, to reiterate;  if he did die, we have a mentally unbalanced woman. And if he didn’t die we have a mentally manipulative and corrupt woman.  And here’s the kicker; she is a psychiatrist, and actually the one person who just happens to be in charge of mental health in Tasmania, more or less.  She advises judges on mentally ill criminals.  She is “the Senior Practitioner” for the Department of Justice [full time], and Premier and Cabinet. And yes, senior practitioner is a single person. Meaning she is an expert in psychology.

Marita O’Connell has been working as a Court Liaison Officer with Forensic Mental Health Services…

…Court Liasson services in Tasmania interface with both the Magistrates Court and the Supreme Court and provide mental health assessment of defendants…and provide advice to Judges and Magistrates.

What a coincidence. The education and disposition that is needed to present this push for inclusion of the public in this money-maker illusion mind-control, including atheism, just happens to be her life. Why do I say atheism? Because psychiatry is the claiming life is a technical and manipulable phenomenon devoid of God. It was invented by an atheist [Sigmund Freud] and the psychiatrist must necessarily claim any help you might get with your life’s problems. That’s where the money is. In fact they need atheist patients for them to be believed in and accepted.

And so why the Beatrix Potter connection? Firstly because it is the name you know, the only one virtually, and it helps salt in the sympathy. You love Potter, you love the girl. It helps endear you to the girl, albeit this would be a subconscious aspect. Potter is admired by millions of people around the world who grew up on her books and or read them to their children.  Many of whom would have researched her online or read a book about her, or watched one of the mainstream documentaries on her. All of which would have included the photo. Or they will see the photo in the future. Secondly, because they are giving a clue to their friends in peerage that this is faked. Potter was a children’s story writer, and they are saying this is a story they are telling the gullible public. It would also help the girl, who is so young, to accept all this, to understand she is in a class untouchable, and this is how it works. Corrupting her to live her life as a lie. Putting a deep psychological burden on her, and investing her as a peer in the divisionary system; the us and them of the controller class. She would, by such ways be forced to give up that universal truth, that freedom of soul we are born with, and which is actually the meaning of life as far as I can tell. That striving to accept people and help them without over-arching criteria and prejudice. Namely wealth. Why do the controller class need to remain in their position of inventing and perpetuating lies? Because they are fearful/cowardly. And they are indoctrinating this beautiful girl into their sick world of fear, lies, and of manipulating and using people. The whole event just reeks. And they are making her a fixed component of it at age 14. For the rest of her life. And oh the shame she must feel for having a father not prepared to be there by her side whenever she may call.

{*If you don’t believe governments/media fake peoples’ deaths, look into the work of Miles Mathis who has exposed dozens of them, including those of Sharon Tate, Kobe Bryant, Trotsky. Something there for everyone. Yes, it’s incredible and sounds outlandish. Some of these are investigated more than others, with Sharon Tate, “victim” of Charles Manson being a stunning expose, and a good place to start. Or just browse his free articles here and here in a word search of “fake”; two index pages of articles. Rely on Google though to judge his articles, and you will be dissuaded heavily.}

So we have an uncommonly white-skinned black-haired young girl who has lived with ashes particularly relevant to only her life, for nine years. Too shocking but always there close at hand. As if the fear has made her white. She dresses in colour as if looking so forward to the release of her nightmare where “a lot of people will be reflecting” that means you, and she WILL BE realising. She clutches a dog as if she needs this comfort so much. She wears this colour as if she is just so dependant on it, obsessed with this upcoming event. A leafless branch hovers menacingly over their heads in a green landscape. The dog and her are central in the photo, colour-wise and  positioning, as they are in the subject matter of the writing. Sh had pitch black hair, and is next to an old woman with almost white hair. Might you think now to start a tradition of showing the government class you are finally done with the religion that allowed you all sorts of ideas about God and your ancestors—that is to say free thinking? Ready to have your family accept this fake culture from government. ‘Family’ is the key word here.

And so I decided to look into this extremely rare, almost extinct name of Beatrix. It turns out that it came into public consciousness to some degree in the modern era via the Kill Bill films, just before this girl was born.. On a search of the name this is mostly what comes up on the internet. There were three films, action films packed with extreme violence. The last one made in 2006, the year before the girl’s birth.. The story line is that she is shot in the head on her husband’s orders, but survives after a coma, and ends with her killing her husband with “the exploding heart technique”. She then starts a new life with her daughter, called B.B. [‘Bea’ is the shortened version of ‘Beatrix’]. Something of the script Marita and Justin decided on. Head trauma/tumour, only to recover undercover and still be her dad. 

I would say that the fireworks memorial was not up and running before Marita heard about it, as we are told. Marita and co instigated it as a psy-op from scratch. In the article she states how she just applied for it on her phone, and the answer came quickly. All so sudden and spontaneous for Marita. I don’t think so. The whole idea was thought up by these very people with this family to be the advertisement for it. Just as the dog looks to be suddenly picked up, all so spontaneous. That dog doesn’t look too comfortable, does it? The parents were not getting on, and needed to think of a way that covered the public and indoctrinated the girl into it too. The idea of public comprehension had them looking at the public’s perception of the name.  And this is represented in only two places; Potter and these films. And they used both for good measure. Overplaying their hand.

This class use psychology on the masses. It is in everything they do and it flies by us all the time with most people not knowing. In fact something just did a minute ago;

In Lieu of flowers please vote Labour {after all, he will be watching!}

Why capitalise the l in “Lieu”? Because it makes the word ‘Labour’ less obvious, and the statement less shocking.

In lieu of flowers please vote Labour {after all, he will be watching!}

‘Labour’ becomes the focus, and as such its more confronting, more disrespectful and petty. Too obvious.

Now let’s hear from the “artist” whatever, Alex Podger, same article;

“…celebrating our own impermanence….”

Sorry, but celebrating our own impermanence is the idiot’s road to suicide.

“…helping other people feel catharsis…” 

Sorry again Podge. ‘Catharsis’ means to rid yourself of filth. Memorial means to accept and remember. These are two opposing concepts.

Two opposing concepts. And that is the psychiatrix. A man who chases two Peter Rabbits, catches neither. That would be for St Peter, supposedly crucified on an upside down cross. Haha, the joke is on you, boys and girls.

UPDATE 25/03/26

I noticed again this ad which has been on buses and billboards around the state.

A Spinger Spaniel with another young girl. And no, Springer Spaniels are not a common type of dog in Tasmania. Also, the face is a tad unusual, not childish.

Now what I am about to say might sound far-fetched. Most people will believe all this is a coincidence, I reckon. I don’t because I have been decoding this psycho-state since I got here over 10 years ago. I just noticed this without looking for it, now I have the thread to follow. Now I, and you, know something of the plan, we will surely find lots more such things, past, present and future. Well, not so much in the future because they are now forced to pull the plug on it. No pun intended. Though that won’t be easy. It will have to die a slow death. They will keep trying to make it work. So it is up to you to spread this article around as much as possible.

Here is what I believe;

This is part of a drive to have a royal class of people–which includes the Walshes of course [David Walsh now with his Order of Australia medal form the Queen] celebrated in Tasmania around Queen Mary of Denmark [who was born and raised in Tasmania]. The first evidence of that is that they tried something similar before with Merle Oberone. [That failed, but only mostly failed, as most people today believe the Tasmanian government wasn’t in on it. That no one did any sort of background check on this woman, and invited her into the heart of Tasmanian peerage society. Ridiculous! Life just doesn’t work like that. Peerage society is a background-check manifest]. Anyway, the next evidence is that there is no need for this ad at all. Tasmania will definitely never run out of water. There is no such threat and there never will be. Besides that, it is a commodity as used by the people. Do you waste sugar or any other thing you have to pay for? [See below how pricing for water in Tasmania is different to any other state]. As a commodity, it means the government are profiting from water. Even if there was such a wasting of water, they can just up the price. Yes, this might be a way to keep the rates up, convincing you it is scarce, but there is more to it. Note the way SAVE OUR is so close to the word SAVIOUR, especially as the two words are so close together. This is our next clue. Saviour thing, with the girl standing in between.

So this motif of the dog and the girl plays back to Dark Mofo, the death aspect. They want you to accept Dark Mofo as family friendly, they want to contain you in their atheistic conception of reality. They want you to accept water, the stuff of life, as all part and parcel of your reality that will include Dark Mofo and how you dispose of your dead, and your following of their appointed royals. With MONA now advertising the storing of your ashes for a fee. But that fee is just a bluff. If it were for free you wouldn’t feel you were hobnobbing with royalty in the afterlife. Water is a profound necessity, and so is, they would have us think, royalty and Dark Mofo. [= money/government].

This–by the way– is why I promote gardening for the young, where money is less of a necessity. Something to lessen the alienating pressure the young have to fit into a world where jobs are piecemeal. And a fair government would do this beyond everything else. But then they would lose power. So it is up to you. Teach your young self-sufficiency, less stress more meditational living, in a state with no industry, and few solid salaries. Stop them living for escapism, whether vaping or other drugs and whether drink or Hollywood or recorded music, or extreme sports. But the government of course have now monopolised this idea of gardening for the young in order to control it, steering it their way by tying gardening for the young to David Walsh’s wife. As if she is the first to think of this idea.. And of course its given a name related to money and luxury [themselves] “The 99 Carrots Program” [which doubles for a shot at Islam’s 99 names of God. And believe me I have plenty more examples of that!]. So Mrs Walsh is a gardener involved in schooling and families when not “making a dessert shaped from a mould of the vulva of a former girlfriend.” [See Richard Flannagan, celebrated Tasmanian writer]. This woman married to a man who has joked about selling drugs to school children.

This–if I am correct–means that this poor girl Beatrix has been roped into being the royal figurehead. Someone to appear with Queen Mary and or her children, as their chaperone when they visit Tasmania. Along with the Walshes and or their children. If you haven’t been paying attention, this government/media has used symbolism wherever they can to form David Walsh into a king of Tasmania figure. Start considering it and you will see the evidence. Starting with his name, king David, that king of the Jews, where Tasmania got the first and second synagogues in Australia built–one in Hobart one in Launceston. Now you understand the upside down cross a bit better.

Mrs Walsh being crowned by her friends or employees.

And so Beatrix is set up for society pages, and all that. In fact she was recently in such pages in the Hobart Mercury online–found in a passing search. And from there she will have children and be media wonderment for the disillusioned souls that don’t have anything to do with their minds. All worked out in the long-count scheming of these govern-mental class of people. Compounding over years. The captured audience of DARK MOFO, will be complimented and merged with the captured other half of the population. Those people that like to wave flags and line the streets to glimpse royalty and luxury. This is why Marita didn’t mind roping her daughter into this little funerary hoax. Her daughter will be some sort of Tas princess. Yes, this is all conjecture by me, but remember, this girl is already a peer, and is probably related to Mary in some way. Well, definitely, as all these people have been inbreeding for centuries. And they see themselves as being celebrated in the future, with the catalysts being Queen Mary and David Whitewash.

A picture of Queen Mary and David Walsh’s out of focus wife with her handbag in the ABC article online. They don’t look to be on the same page, do they? Those reading this article are loving Mary, the article is about them, not the Walshes. Only the next generation will merge their conception of royalty from the two polarities. David has already got the Order of Australia medal yes, but the filth and nonsense that comes out of his mouth won’t stop while he is alive. And his wife has actually come out saying he has autism. Right. She married an autistic. All this is because the Walshes were designed largely to be hated by the class of people that go in for royalty and family values [largely Christians]. For now. But this Tasmanian government is totally vulgar, they can mash together anything for profit while feeding you their alcohol, Tasmania’s first industry. You won’t care after a few, and after years of being told MONA is “pumping millions into the economy”. The Walshes were designed to be hated by half the population, and this is free advertisement to interest the other half, the cynical half. Now you fully understand their upside down cross. You love it or you hate it. If you hated it in the beginning, you soften as you are told “the economy” benefits from Dark Mofo, over and over, and start seeing the Walshes with real royalty, Mary and co.. You see any success for MONA as good, not appreciating that real culture has been and is always eclipsed. Your taxes channelled into what you think is the only option. It’s not. They want you to see their figureheads as the defining of culture, just as they want you to equate sociability with drinking alcohol. If there is one sentence I want you to remember, it is that one. They want alcohol and their own figurehead-actors. Pure and simple. Accept this fact and you are free of it, of them. Free to start analysing what they do objectively. Stop drinking, stop believing the lies.

You should hate the upside down cross, as it was done to offend and dislodge everyone, especially the young from remembering their own heritage via the war memorial. But you should hate it not as the work of David Walsh, but as the work of the government entire. That long list of people I will introduce in the next chapter, who don’t give a toss about the context or meaning of democracy or anything else but their drink and salary.

And remember all media is their media. The article states;

What jumps out? MONA [which yes was designed for the word ‘monarchy’] and ROYA, and what is the only name there? That’s right, our autistic king David. And they have put the name ‘David’ alone in the top right hand corner, for reasons of psychology.

Here are the royal couple Mary and Hubby with the Governor General Barbara Banker,… sorry Baker.

Barbara toasting again.

LATER; It has just occurred to me. As with so much goofiness the inbred do, their rationale only came to me in a quite moment. We have the fire of cremation and death, and the water of life, the “saviour”. Life and death, winter and summer all in the bony hands of these modern sorcerers. These free-range mental patients we call government. Dark Mofo has lots of fire going on, as well as human ashes in the breathing space of the city. Including a large bonfire for families to write their problems on paper and have them burned. Yes, it sounds like the idea of a psychiatrist, doesn’t it?

And so, if I am right about all of this, then I have wrecked their plans haven’t I? And I am sure this lovely young girl Beatrix will be all the happier for it. No need to thank me.

*6/04/26

Things just come rolling along about all this now I have the thread. To appreciate the next points you need to know that In Tasmania we pay for all the water we use absolutely. Unlike the rest of Australia where water is designated, and you pay only for any excess used. which seems more natural doesn’t it? It’s like we are paying for air or gravity or something here. If water is “our thing”, why are we the only ones having to buy it absolutely? Psychology is why. So water here is like money, or pegged to money in value, and its the stuff of life. So we can see how it is something the government would conspire to use as programming over the long term. Terms in which the common man never ventures to think. Terms beyond television and cunning media. Save our water, saviour/life is water is money. Save our =saviour. With death/fire/dark Mofo being that other pole.

Every water bill in the state was sent out for a few years with this image printed on the front of the envelope–for no apparent reason. For we all know what water is.

Water is Tasmania’s thing? Really? Are we fish people down here? Surely it costs significant money to have colour printed envelopes. So why do it? Because it suggests to the subconscious mind stigmata, the saviour. Look at that hand. Add to that, we have a triangle in the logo, which is the inversion of the Triangle on David Walsh’s museum. Yes, Tasmania is a triangle, but nevertheless.

And so what do two triangles together make? Yes, the star of David. Zionism is the key to unlocking so much about these psychiatrix. Sounds unlikely I know. But the power of the subconscious is very deep, and they work incessantly over decades, It’s all they do. This is your government now.

And just as an aside for a moment, take this from an Ombudsman lawyer, sent to me, as evidence of their complacency and fraud regarding real governing.

Ombudsman Tasmania… [does] not provide a service to advocate on behalf of complainants with government departments.  Our role is to promote good administrative practice and we do not act for either the complainant or the public authority. 

Do not act? So why are they giving off judgments? A judgement against you is manifestly an action, and an action for the public authority, the government. And, believe me, all judgements are against the public. [See below]. And why aren’t they even arbitrating, which they firstly claim as their job in the public arena. Arbitrating means relaying messages. Either Clare Hopkins the writer here is lying, or their public definition is a lie, [making her a representative of a lie].

This is from their website;

 The Ombudsman’s role is to ensure that public authorities act fairly and reasonably, 

How do they “ensure” without taking any action?

So we have a psychological manipulative government. One that excels at obscure language, legalese and lies. But we can decipher it all because all lies have motives. Find the motive, uncover the lies. and the motive is zionism/profit and ensuring their status unfairly.

Tasmania not only got the first brewery, it got the first two synagogues in Australia. And who invented psychoanalysis, and our supposed psychological essence defined? A Jew and atheist called Sigmund Freud. And this is why we have this phenomenon in Tasmania. We just have never been looking for it.

The electricity company also uses a triangle logo–albeit stylized; This one nothing to do with the shape of Tasmania.

You will say it is represent an ‘A’ for Aurora. But why would any electricity company call itself Aurora? Its like calling Tasmanian Meteorology “Rainbow Meteorology”. It was done to appeal to the public so as to make is seem green and natural. Remember, they just came through one of the greatest protest moments in Australian history. And it was done in the time when the Green party were beginning to hold some sway. B.P [British Petroleum] changed their logo to a green sunflower around the same time..

What I am saying is the ‘A’ was another deciding factor in their choice. They knew they were going to build a giant concrete triangle, and so chose the word. Again, these people think in the long term. Know your enemy. And that triangle at MONA has for years now been presenting an electric blue something at night;

Power. And with the square framing we can see they have designed it to reflect in the water as a Star of David. Note the angled struts on either side going up to the two top corners of the square. Hard to see in this daytime photo. Not so at night surely. But a night photo is not available online.

Getting back to water;

[The water in Tasmania] is charged at 10 times the rate they sell treated water to irrigators of vineyards for. Then they have the audacity to castigate us for water wastage. They have a bloated middle and upper management that can only come up with complex schemes in out of the way places that should have been paid for by the people who want to live in the back of whoop whoop,…

[Thanks commenter]

Furthermore, David Walsh’s upside down cross, or rather that which was and is attributed to him, was explained by him as having many interpretations. And he mentioned only one, St Peter. And so guess the name of the very next premier of Tasmania at that time; Peter. David Walsh the mystic. Or rather this government the Theatre! Keep this in mind when I show you below hard evidence that this government is entirely corrupt, and entirely Zionist. And this Peter was not just any old Peter, he was Peter Gutwein. Yes as in German for ‘good wine’. And what do Christians believe? That Christ enters us through sacramental wine. The wine they sell at Dark Mofo around the upside down cross. The joke is on you [if you go there]. They are gloating that they run the government. Laughing at us while taxing us to ever higher stress levels.

Pulse Tasmania has an article up about low water levels in Tasmania which has, according to them caused this ad campaign, but it gives absolutely no figures, and has the good old anonymous quotes [disembodied quotation marks]. Water levels are “very low”, it says. It gives a picture of this man, apparently photo-shopped.

Matt Balfe said water supply levels were dropping in some locations. Image / Supplied

Why is he grinning like some actor/manipulator in a photo shoot? Because he is. Water levels are always dropping in some locations. They are either dropping or they are rising.

Absolutely no figures at all in the article. Matt supplied a photo of himself grinning, but failed to present any proof at all. At least at this time of writing. And this is just about proof in itself that this whole thing is a scam.

Here is his bio from Linked-In

I have more than 20 years’ experience spanning government, technology, telecommunications, entertainment, and utilities, specialising in culture transformation, corporate strategy, operations, community engagement, digital and marketing….

And this page lists him as working for Yarra City Council. Which is not in Tasmania folks. So why would this man be called in? Because he has a head like an Easter Egg? I am only half joking here. Or because he can make changes and move away, leaving everyone not in the loop dumbfounded. Exactly the same thing happened with the General Manager of New Norfolk Council. Another story.

A photo I will add later is the more common billboard of the girl with the dog which I can’t now find online. It’s the same photo as the one given above, but the words say only “OUR WATER” on one side of the girl and dog, and “OUR THING”, on the other. And if we are not fish people, then there is some psychology going on.

Now consider this one;

That woman is not anything to do with this family, as it is presented in other places. Who is she? Why is she there? Why is she smiling? Ever seen a death notice with a grinning anyone, let alone an anonymous woman in a sun hat? Why is she next to the words “Beautifull father”? Is “Beautiful” really appropriate for summing up a man’s fatherhood legacy? Or is it to slur your thoughts over to his soon-to-be-in-your-face daughter? Is that what the image is representing? Remember, the 14 year old did have prominent front two teeth..

Yes, it could be to suggest the young daughter. She is the one to be celebrated, to be part of Dark Mofo lore. Or is it just to spin your mind in other cunning ways? Is it an inside joke on her teeth? A rabbit thing? They have enhanced the teeth to say, “Yes, Peter Rabbit, haha,” to their friends? Even if it is a relative, again this is not the done thing. and not done for a good reason, as noted. Justin died and he loved this woman the most? Give me a break.

It has just occurred to me the teeth are not real in this photo of the daughter at 14 year old. How could these people think to do this to a child? I happen to know that her teeth DO NOT look anything like this in real life today! I had assumed it was baby teeth I was looking at. Pretty darn stupid of me yes. The latest baby teeth fall out is 13 years old, mostly long before that. Here she is 14. So are these teeth based on some information that this ensures sympathy, seems cute to most people? And they have posted an older woman with buck teeth to suggest the poor poor daughter? In terms of subconscious association I mean. Or is it that the whole dark MOFO upside-down cross thing is called “Operation Peter Rabbit” or something? And it is a wink to their peerage associates that the death is fake.

This ham-handed fake death is just incredible. What you get when you decide to manipulate the public while envisioning yourselves as royal, I suppose. And if you know anyone to do with the law or psychiatry let them read this article. I would like some feedback. But what professionals these days dare speak out about anything? I could waste my time sending it to the UTAS law department. But I already know the answer; No acknowledgment of the question.

And this rabbit hole just gets deeper and deeper. For there is a Peter Rabbit Gardens in Tasmania which is, yes, you might have known, a vineyard estate.

The only licenced Peter Rabbit (TM) Garden outside the UK. The Peter Rabbit (TM) Garden has been created from the inspiration of the many Beatrix Potter illustrations from the original Peter Rabbit (TM) Books, sketches, letters and journals.
As you wander through the garden the story of Peter Rabbit (TM) unfolds, and you will see the characters from the Peter Rabbit (TM) story, some of which will be animated to enhance your enjoyment. The garden will delight your imagination as you see familiar characters 

Right. And if you drink just enough wine, Peter and friends will dance around your car as you drive home.

Why they are taking so much care to write TM after the words Peter Rabbit is because they are claiming these two words are copywritten, a Trade Mark, and they are the only ones that have the rights to use them. Pathetic! Beatrix Potter is one of the most successful entrepreneurs in history. Her legacy is worth billions to some people somewhere. Might some of her family tree have settled in Tasmania?

So this is Taxmania folks, the Psycho State. And I am starting to think Marita named her daughter because she likes so much the word and god-like power of psychiatrics . That would be just about the most pathetic thing I have ever heard.

2; Sophie Muller.

Here below is something from an article in the Hobart Mercury. Again, an article they keep up for free reading, unlike most others. Whether ABC, Hobart Mercury, or anything else, don’t let the difference of names convince you of independent thought.

The picture is of a supposed resident neighbour to the Hobart Mosque, Sophie Muller, visiting.  She, like Marita, also just happened to work for the Department of Premier and Cabinet, though again, this is not mentioned in the article. She just lives near the mosque, it would seem. Look now at how she sits here in the only photo, in the mosque next to the Imam.

She can pass for being nervous, cant she? Psychology, I tell you. In one sense it seems natural and candid [again], but at the same time it can be interpreted as her being uncomfortable, wishing she were some place else, looking to the side for help, reassurance. Did neither she nor the photographer know how to take a photo? “Look at the camera Sophie”, “Eyes front” or “Three, two, one…” I have never seen it, as far as I can recall. This article mentions Isis, the terrorist organisation, as if this man has to answer for that Israeli deception. So these two things work together, the eyes and the words, and are not so apparent for those not thinking suspiciously enough. The two things work together for a greater effect.

This article, like all the other articles about the mosque from the Hobart Mercury I could find, was photographed by someone called David, David Beniuk. As in the star of David and David king of the Jews, the eternal enemies of? Yes, that’s right, the Muslims. The coincidences pile up, don’t they? This Mercury article appeared just as the most recent events in Israel/Gaza began.

After I first saw it, I thought to clarify that this was actually the same woman in the government. I spoke to her secretary on the phone, who said “Yes, it is. What are you intending to do with this information?” To which I said “whatever I want”. Which is this.

Here she is, eyes front.

This poster was put up in the central bus terminal in Hobart, during the reign of Queen Elizabeth. The figure on the right is in the Muslim dua position, or close enough, which is the position of asking God for something. The glass smashed by a member of the frustrated public. Probably a youth, drunk and vaping and tattooing themselves to oblivion.

3; Danielle Wood

This woman is a writer of fiction and the senior professor of English at UTAS, and has a daughter who was friends with my own daughter for about a year. I met the daughter once, who I found both charming and a little worrying. Worrying in that she was little so energetic and bubbly. But they were friends so I was happy for their friendship. Then an event happened which caused me to write a blog where I mostly addressed my daughter’s friends, and had her send it to this girl and others. It was partly to explain the dangers of alcohol in this state where the main industry is owned by those who control culture, al la MONA and the festivals. And their school had just had them read the book Breakfast at Tiffanys, which is a glorification of the drinking lifestyle, among other things [far different to the film].

And in addressing the cynicism and hate for Christianity that Tasmania now celebrates, I wrote “Don’t throw out the baby with the bathwater. You don’t have to become a nun or a priest to cherish sobriety and virginity. And these two things are inter-related”. I thought that would have encouraged any parents to count on me as a friend. To know they have an ally in protecting their children. So I was taken aback when this girl told my daughter that my writing was “unhinged”.

But I believe this came from the mother. I don’t think any child would call sobriety and virginity “unhinged”. Especially without a comment as to anything in particular. Something deeper was going on. The single mother Danielle Wood?  

So I decided to look into her world. And I wasn’t disappointed. Climate change, Aboriginal land rights, and LGBTQ. All the government hobbyhorses to keep you feeling guilty and antagonistic, divided, embroiled and not focusing on the nature of this beastly class. Thinking less about the things I am talking about.

A few things jumped out at me from her blog, here is one of them–quoted for your critical thinking and in the public interest.

 “LaTrobe University’s Writing Themselves In 4 study (2021), which surveyed young LGBTQA+ Australians aged between 14 and 21, found rates of suicidal ideation, making a suicide plan, and attempting suicide were higher among participants whowere trans women, trans men or non-binary, compared with cisgendered participants (ie. those whose sense of gender corresponds to their birth sex). It found 37.9% of trans and gender diverse participants had attempted suicide at some point in their lives.d 21, found rates of suicidal ideation, making a suicide plan, and attempting suicide were higher among participants who were trans women, trans men or non-binary, compared with cisgendered participants (ie. those ‘whose sense of gender corresponds to their birth sex). It found 37.9% of trans and gender diverse participants had attempted suicide at some point in their lives. 

Stop reading for a moment and let it sink in. Translate the statistic into real people’s lives. Get related to the consequences of people not being accepted, included, fairly treated, valued. 

To which I sent her an email, asking might there just be another reason they would be suicidally depressed? Yes, such as destroying their bodies, their procreative functions. Such as deciding they were in fact a man or woman after all. To which she didn’t respond.

I then wrote to  dozens of professors and teachers at UTAS’ Sociology Department asking for some ball-park statistic on the amount of trans people who commit suicide for the obvious reason, so I could inform their colleague, Ms Wood. [Yes, by the way, you read that right. There are dozens of teaching staff there in sociology. Sounds fitting, doesn’t it? In fact there were so many I gave up, not getting to the end of the pages listed. For all I know UTAS is the biggest business in the state, with hundreds of sociologists and others working online for thousands of people, millions of dollars]. Anyway, you know the story. No replies. Not one. And I know they get the emails. I have communicated with professors with this same email address, and anyway, I sent for email receipts this time, suspecting that for some reason I had been banished.

So no answer, rather than being happy to set the record straight, that is to say, believing in their profession, believing they are there to do public good. Let that sink in for a moment. They not only didn’t respond to the question, they refused to acknowledge the email. Hard evidence of being in it for the money. Every one of them! They don’t want to rock the boat concerning a colleague, they might find there is no work for them next year.

And so I went and looked at one of Ms Wood’s novels, reading as much as I could bear.  Finding both the word ‘unhinged’ [must be one of her favourites] and  ‘Justin’ [an abusive husband], within the first 50 pages [as far as I could read]. Call it a coincidence if you want. I don’t. The text was dripping with that tame wit of the self-satisfied, but for walks in the zoo garden where she got down what she would call poetic allusion. Try ‘mental illusion’, and you’re on your way.

As for alcohol and children, when my daughter was 17 she was invited to an 18th birthday party sleep-over of an upper-middleclass family. It was far away and we didn’t know this family. But she dearly wanted to go and I said she could after she confirms there will be no alcohol. Neither of us really thought there would be. But we got a disconcerting answer. Yes, texted the mother, there would be, but there would be non alcoholic drinks available too, and mother and her husband would ensure everyone was safe. Absurd. So your best friends are drinking while you are not because you are technically seventeen. Does that sound like a mature plan? What sort of party rationale is going on here? And so I forbid her going. Not because I didn’t trust my daughter—I do— but because I didn’t like the insane and patronising tone [she said other things] of the woman and the lack of true hospitality. A few days later I asked my daughter if anyone had mentioned her not going to the party. She said, no, not really, but the birthday girl had said to her that it was probably good she didn’t go, as a few people were throwing up.

So if you want to start a revolution in Tasmania, start by stop drinking their alcohol.. Do it for your kids, who you know will emulate what you do, and you know will over do it. This is what children do. They emulate and over do it. You might find it is the best thing you ever did. Let’s take back the community from these sickos. I am sure the police will agree with us, once the police comprehend the nature of the system. Pressurising the community with debt and this fake culture, the dead-end culture of oblivion escapism and cynicism. They just need to intellectualise it, to think about it rationally. Tattoos never solved anything. Do it for only yourselves and your children, our children, those people we all live to protect and guide, whether we are honest police and non-police parents alike. God will answer the effort. It worked for me, and my daughter is as stable, sensible, bright, humorous and motivated as I could ever have hoped. Live in harmony with nature and God and you won’t feel the need to tattoo your child’s name onto your arm, like our dear premier.

There are two facts about alcohol you might want to consider. 1] it has zero health benefit, though we have been told otherwise for decades. See this video. 2] it is known to be one of the hardest drugs to detox/withdraw from. So supplement your life with some wholesome regularity, including exercise. You will also live longer in health, de-burdening your kids of that negative too. [See this excellent video on that] Do you want your kids to be changing your nappy, guiding you to the toilet when you are old? Shackled with you as you deteriorate? Well that is what is coming up as you remain in David Walsh’s perpetual swirl, a living for sensual pleasures and supposed liberation from traditions. In fact, look at this “genius” now. He can hardly form a sentence. Trying to impress you with his paradoxes and outrageousness. Promoting himself, this culture. The government culture prescribed. Corrupted government, the government class, and the force-feeding of their atheism infantilism for their profit perpetual. They want you to equate sociability with drinking, and it is eroding our youth, in both senses of the term.

As for Climate Change, see this video, which includes this quote from a real professor;

“It’s a wonderful way to increase government power. If there’s an existential threat out there that’s world-wide, then you need a powerful world-wide government to cope with it.”

Welcome to Zionism, the one world financial government of mind control. Where we pay our taxes to people like the three deceitful women above.

2

My most recent case with the Ombudsman Office lead me on a path that demonstrates how these people operate. Bear with the details, for they are important to understanding the larger picture;

It involved my having been bitten by a dog on a quiet Saturday afternoon, in the main shopping street of New Norfolk, the then lowest socio-economic area of Hobart. Yet a town about to boom with massive new housing estates on three sides. I had never been bitten by a dog in my life because I am wary of them. And the dog in question I had tried to give a wide berth, not liking the look of it. But it was on an illegally long leash [as I later worked out technically] and was unattended. It ran at me without warning, without bark or growl, leaping up and biting onto my elbow. I took steps back to have the leash go taught and pull my arm free. When the owner arrived a minute later, I told him I was bitten. “Not this dog. This is a Staffordshire Bull Terrier. You must have imagined it.” He said, walking off. I followed for a while, but decided to call the police on this junky. The police came and photographed my torn jacket and the bloody fang marks in my arm. [Yes, bitten through the jacket]. The police soon found the man and phoned me, saying they had given him an infringement notice. I spoke with one of the officers through the police intercom the next day; “I thought we dealt with that yesterday”, he told me. I asked if the incident was caught on the video camera. It was, he said, but I wasn’t allowed to see it. Had he seen it? He had, but, “You can’t actually see the dog attack you”, he said. What?! He was referring to an electricity circuit box that hid the actual biting, but he confirmed from my next question that you could see the dog run at me. What was he getting at? I thought then, and still think, that he wanted me to discount the video as evidence. They had fined the dog owner, they [the police/government] had received payment, I was now out of the picture. The matter was over. When I asked him about public safety he told me to talk to the council. That was my job, apparently.

A day or two later I spoke to a different officer, far more co-operative, who told me that the dog had attacked two other people that day! [I assume it attacked one person and then another who stepped in to help].

i wrote to the council and got no response for two weeks. Then the New Norfolk Dog Control Officer Melissa Collins contacted me, having “been on holiday” with no one replacing her, apparently. She claimed she was unaware of the details, and would contact the police.  She then emailed some days later–at my prompting– to say she had visited the dog owner and there was nothing more she could do, as the police had already issued an infringement notice. I asked whether she had seen the video. She wrote, “I was unable to view the CCTV footage”. When I asked why, she didn’t answer. No more communication from her. And the General Manager of New Norfolk council told me to stop writing to her, that the matter was over. And that no, I couldn’t bring this issue up in a council meeting.

I confirmed with the police that the video was still available, so she was lying. I was told that the video was from the council’s own surveillance camera, as the attack happened outside the council building. The police said they have access to it too.

And so I wrote to the mayor of New Norfolk about it. My first ever email to her. No answer. I wrote again. No answer. And again. No answer.

Note again that the government profit from the infringement notice, profit from your misery, while you are denied taking the matter to court. [See below for more on this].

To give this some context, this type of dog is one of the most dangerous in the world, and is known for fatal attacks on humans. Obviously if a child had been grabbed by the one that got me, it wouldn’t have escaped as I had. I knew to pull back continually until its leash eventually held it and I could pull away. A child would have been on the ground bleeding in seconds, the taste of blood in the dog’s mouth.

WARNING; GREVIOUS IMAGE AHEAD;

Same child. Same type of dog. Just so you understand my concern here.

I couldn’t understand why this was happening. Why the police seemed so disinterested, why video of the attack and photos of my own injury were some big secret denied me.

So I took it to the Ombudsman, to see how they would react to this new public concern, and as much to gain more evidence against them. Actually, anyone’s complaints to the Ombudsman are necessarily public concerns. If the government cheat you and get away with it, they will cheat the next guy. Potentially keeping us all in danger. All I have ever sought in my lodging complaints with them, is an apology from the wrong-doer.

So the Ombuds “investigated”. Here is my letter to the Governor General which explains more;

Dear Governor General Barbara Baker,
 
 I am writing about the honesty and integrity of your appointed Ombudsman and his people. And describe here for you a fraction of the absurdity in their mishandling my recent case; this [result] from one Tom Perrin.
 
 I was bitten by a dog in New Norfolk. I informed Tom that the police had told me this dog had bitten three people on that day. Tom conducts his “investigation”, two months long, and informs me that no, my information was wrong, and that there were no further dog attacks but for mine. And that the council was right in deeming the dog, the skin-breaking dog, a non-dangerous one.
 
 I then informed Tom that I have recorded the police telling me over the phone of the three attacks. Tom them responds that his information was only from the council, actually. [i.e the subject under his investigation]. And apparently my claim about the police hadn’t been for him worth considering. And that his investigation had been a “preliminary” one. And that, despite being a preliminary one, and the information about the police still standing, the case was now closed, and they recommended I call Lifeline about my “trauma”. Yes really. This is all documented.
 .—–

And when I said a two months long investigation by these Ombud lawyers, it is not that they eventually contacted me. It was me who contacted them and forced them to respond. As I have found with most others in this gang called government, they will ignore you forever, and are just waiting for you to tire out. See below for the stellar example of that from the very fulcrum of supposed Tasmanian peoples’ justice—The Committee on Integrity.

And so the Governor General’s representative “on her behalf” responded that I should complain to the Ombudsman. Yes really! And this is typical in-your-face contempt they show the public on every level. Something which they actually have a name for, its called “mirroring”. Pretending to show concern and address something but really just giving the morphed complaint back to the aggrieved, then claiming they have addressed it. I replied with clinical patience the information that the Ombudsman’s supposed function is firstly arbitration, and that in my considerable dealings with them over the years, never was my point of view represented to the other party, and never was the other party’s views or answers relayed to me, or even acknowledged. No arbitration, only fraud.  I also indicated that I had much more evidence. To which she said she had “no role” in the matter. No role, no interest. There you go.

Here is a quick example of the legal junk the government has concocted hoping you won’t understand, so they can dodge any logic and facts you might send them.

From The Tasmanian Ombudsman Act 

5.   Appointment, &c., of Ombudsman

(1A)   The Governor may appoint a person to be known as the Ombudsman.

…

(4)  A person who is a member of a House of Parliament or a candidate for election as a member of any such House of Parliament, … is disqualified from holding, or being appointed to, the office of Ombudsman…

(5)  For the purpose of  subsection (4) , a person becomes a candidate for election as a member of a House of Parliament ….

Now go off and make head or tail of subsection [4]. Which is this;

(8)  The Ombudsman is entitled to such remuneration and expenses as the Governor determines, and holds office subject to such terms and conditions (if any) with respect to matters not provided in this Act as may be prescribed.

What does “if any” plus “may” mean? A way to confusion you and cover themselves. Because technically the whole thing means the Ombudsman is apparently completely under the authority of the Governor General, but they have thrown in “if any” so they can negate that entirely if they want to. Meaning the Ombudsman is potentially there on his own terms, completely untouchable, and need not respond to anyone in government, or the Govenor General who then steps back and says “Hey, I have no role, I am ceremonial now”. As if her appointing of him was a freak of nature. Its like a builder saying, “Well yes, I hired this man who drove my bulldozer over your car, but now I am just ceremonial. And no, I cant reveal his name or where he lives or anything else. Or whether he is my drunken brother-in-law.” Ceremonial now, but real when she chose her mate instead of you or I to be the man. And this is how they dissolve into mist before your eyes. But they don’t want you even looking in this direction and have another false corridor, the Integrity Comitttee, who we will meet now. 

After replying to her with a long letter, she answered with giving me the email address of The Joint Standing Committee on Integrity. And I forwarded them my two letters to Barbara Baker, the Governor General, and was eventually answered [a month later] saying;

And with that the matter was gone. Or would have been. Five months later I wrote to them again;

Dear Fiona Murphy and Hon. Rosmary Armatage MLC,

Its getting up to 5 months now since you asked the ombudsman to respond. Has everyone on the “committee on integrity” forgotten about this? How many more months will you wait?

From Gordon

No answer. Then I informed the whole government, including the Governor General that the Integrity Committee was missing. That is to say, I informed 68 people. Ministers and senators;

To Whom it May Concern,

The integrity committee is not there. Please read the exchanges in the attachment, and see if you can either get them to answer me, or direct me to a more worthwhile correspondent.

Thanks.

From Gordon

No one responded! Well, actually two people responded, if you can call it that. Check it out;

…As the Member for Mersey I was unable to find your name and residential details on the Mersey electoral roll.  

Please feel free to contact me again if you are in fact a Mersey constituent. 

If not, I wish you well with your issue being resolved, 

Kind regard

Mike 

The Hon Michael Gaffney (MLC)

This man is actually the spearhead for the euthanasia program in Tasmania. Meaning if you are seeking to die, he is there to help you, even though you are not in his Mersey Constituency. The honourable Michael Gaffney.

 Note that there were four emails listed on the government website that didn’t work at all.

deputypremier@dpac.tas.gov.au,

bronwyn.watkins@dpac.tas.gov.au,
 minister.groom@dpac.tas.gov.au,
 pauline.allford@dpac.tas.gov.au,
 

And three who refused to even give an email address on this government page. One of these has his own website, where he puts a tab to press for emailing which doesn’t work. [But it might after publishing this].

A week later I wrote to the Governor General, sending it also to the rest of them—all 68;

Dear Governor General Barbara Baker,

I wrote to you recently informing you that the Integrity Committee of which you gave me contact details and recommend I contact, has refused to acknowledge me after telling me they have contacted the Ombudsman about the integrity of the matter at hand. As also noted, this promise was five months ago, when they sent me a letter stating this clearly– as you should know because I sent it to you a week ago.

This is to say that I have caught the Integrity Committee and Fiona Murphy red-handed deceiving the public and still refusing to do their first functions, communicate and investigate. In fact we both know it is worse than that, for they had clearly deliberately set out to deceive me, offering this hollow formality in the expectation that I will lose hope and interest in this matter. That is the only explanation for them to now refuse all communication. Don’t you agree?

This is to say that you have recommended that I contact people who are now proven frauds.

Again, this is the second time for writing to you.

Best wishes,

From Gordon

No reply.

I then sent her an email saying that I have taken all correspondences in the emails I have received from her representative, as being the exact thoughts and opinions of Barbra Baker, the Governor General. And that if I don’t hear otherwise, I will take this as fact. No answer.

A week or so later I started to make phone calls. But I firstly went to look at faces. My experience with government has never been good, literally, so I decided to go for a reasonable looking face from their website to help me along. I wasn’t going to call everyone. I went with Ruth Forrest’s face, and she actually answered the phone herself. And so after telling her of the emails, dates and subject fields, I asked if she had gotten them. Yes, she did read them. Does she have a response? She will have to go over them, and she will respond “if they warrant a response”. If she has read them, I asked, why doesn’t she have an opinion? She said she gets a lot of emails, she will have to go over them. It has been a hectic few weeks, she said, with [something] meetings. Why, I asked, does she read people’s emails without acknowledging them? She could send an automatic response  “if that’s what you’d like”. But she likes to be “a bit more personal.” Meaning that to her, no response at all is more personal here than an automated response. When will a response come? She doesn’t know. By when is the latest she will need to form a response?

“I don’t know”

“You don’t know that either.”

“No”.

“Thanks”

“Where are you from?”

But I hung up. And then she texted me;

Ruth; Before I respond – can you please let me know where you are from and reiterate the dates you sent the emails.

Me; I am expecting you to say this matter is under jurisdiction, which it is not, so you need not know. The emails were sent in the 4th and the 10th.

Ruth; I am unable to find the emails. If you let me know where you are from and resend, I will endeavour to respond by Friday. Thank you.

Me; So you won’t respond to them unless you know in which part of Tasmania I live? Why is that?

Ruth; Because its respectful when asking for a response to identify yourself for my records.

Me; Oh really, I live in Sandy Bay.

[Which was true, being after I moved from New Norfolk]

The next day I received this email from the Committee on Integrity sent by Fiona Murphy—after five months and two weeks ignoring me;

I read that early on Friday morning—the Friday by which Ruth Forrest was going to respond– and immediately knew this would be her excuse to sneak away from responding. So I told her it was a ruse. [i.e That I knew it was a ruse.] And I sent this to her and all the others. Yes the whole shaboo of officials again, 68, asking for comment;

Dear Fiona Murphy and Rosemary Armitage

I believe I asked you how long you were prepared to wait. 

From Gordon

But Ruth snuck away anyway. No “endeavour to reply” at all. Then two months later I asked her in email where her response was. And she answered. She said the Ombudsman was understaffed, and she has had to wait just as long or longer than I for him to respond. She said I should engage with the Integrity Committee, as if the issue was not all about them ignoring me! She said she was a little confused about what I was talking about. Here are the last exchanges, all done within an hour via email;

Dear Ms Forrest,

I wrote to the Integrity Committee asking how long they were prepared to wait for the ombudsman to respond. I told you in email they would not answer this question. I am asking you what you think about this. Are they also understaffed, and need more than half a year to answer? Well, if so, they have written to me—and avoided this singular question. So my question to you is;

Why are you directing me back to the integrity committee who have not only ignored me for half a year, but avoided addressing my singular question when they did write to me?

Secondly, you said you have had to wait for the ombudsman to answer “as long or longer” than I. What do you think is an unacceptable amount of time for the ombudsman to keep people waiting?

Thanks,

From Gordon

“““

Hello Gordon,

As Chair of a number of other Committees, I always try to respond to emails/correspondence as soon as possible – on occasions this may take some weeks if the Committee is not sitting (such as over the Christmas break) as if it is correspondence addressed to the Committee, the Committee needs to consider it before the Chair responds.

Regarding the Ombudsman timelines, I would hope most matters could be resolved within 2-3 months at most but if the government inadequately fund the office for the workload it has, I don’t believe we can ‘blame’ the Ombudsman. 

I know additional funding has been requested and some additional funding – not enough – was provided but the office has a huge workload and back log. I agree extended timelines for responses are not appropriate but also acknowledge they can be unavoidable.

Kind regards

Ruth

““`

Dear Ms Forrest,

I have condensed your answers to my questions. Do you think this sums up your response, or do you have something more to add?

Q;Why are you directing me back to the integrity committee who have not only ignored me for half a year, but avoided addressing my singular question when they did write to me?

A; I am not a member of this committee you will need to engage with them. 

You will need to engage with the Committee again if you haven’t received a response.

Q; What do you think is an unacceptable amount of time for the ombudsman to keep people waiting? 

A;…extended timelines … can be unavoidable.

““`

Hello Gordon

I believe I have responded to your question in good faith and do not wish to have them taken out of context. As I have responded a number of times, in good faith, I will not be responding further to the same questions. I believe my answers, when taken in context are clear.

Regards,

Ruth

“““

Dear Ms Forrest

Based on your letter I have three questions;

Firstly;  I asked you to confirm or clarify your answers, so what do you mean by saying those answers were “in good faith”? For most people, something has to be defined in order to have faith in it. 

Secondly; Do you think the Ombudsman, appointed by the British monarchy is not receiving a full salary? And if he isn’t, how would that stop him answering the Committee on Integrity in a timely way?

Thirdly; If, as you say, the Ombudsman is reliant on government funding to operate, why is he, supposedly representing the people, underfunded by the peoples money, and not you/the government?

Thanks,

From Gordon

No reply.

Then two months later the Integrity Committee’s chair Rosemary Armitage again writes;

I asked her why I cant read his response too. To which she never replied.

And I asked the Ombudsman to send me his response. To which he never replied. Then I wrote;

Dear Rosemary Armitage.

There is a problem with your letter. You begin it by stating that you are writing about my “complaint to the Ombudsman”, and not that I was complaining about the Ombudsman. These are two different things. Can you please correct this anomaly and resend me the letter.

Thanks,

From Gordon

No reply.

Then to Ruth;

Dear Ruth Forrest,

I am writing to you about Rosamary Armitage, specifically about her writing to me which I believe you were instrumental in achieving.

She has, like you, written a letter where the difference between the Ombudmsan the man, and the Ombudsman the office, is not clear. Here is a reminder of what you wrote to me;

if the government inadequately fund the office for the workload it has, I don’t believe we can ‘blame’ the Ombudsman. 

Ms Armitage wrote too  about my complaint to the Ombudsman, rather than about the Ombudsman, and that she thinks “the Ombudsman acted appropriately”.  In bothe uses of the word, what is she referring to, the man or the office?

Though I tried to get her to respond, she hasnt.

So would you like to identify who the Ombudsman she is talking about. I.e his/her name, and why she wont respond to clarify this issue. 

Thanks

From Gordon

No replies.

So there you have it folks. The bottom line is that a] the ombudsman/Ombudsman is under no obligation to do anything, so how can he be ensured to serve the public? And even when the supposed government investigates, they keep it all a secret. How can a public representative be not held publicly accountable? He can’t, and this should concern you very much.

Rosemary on the left.

I wrote to the national ombudsman about the Tasmanian one. No response.

And this is what you get when you push things to the end; stone-cold psychopathy.

That is a letter to me from Jeremy Rockliff, now Premier, on a previous matter. Who then refused to answer why he did this crossing out, as did his secretary. ‘Gordon’ is my first name, so if it was a note to address me as ‘Gordon’ he would have crossed out the ‘Mr’ too. Right?

And I believe that yes, Ruth’s asking where I lived was also form of psychological intimidation. You see, they realise that on this island they can easily scare and frustrate you back to the Australian mainland, an hour’s flight away. The cold and the rents are already nipping at you.

All these people are there to compartmentalise you.They own the media, you have no way of informing the greater population, but for efforts like this writing which you should pass on to others. Yes, I have tried the media too. Never an answer. And by owning the media they own you too, the thoughts and beliefs you have. The belief that government and media are separate, the belief that government and business are separate. The belief that David Walsh is some sort of genius and won his way to controlling the sad culture of cynicism we have, which is really from the government class. And the belief that all this is separate from schooling. Later we will look at two examples of people working in powerful positions in the government, not in the public eye, who just happen to appear in the media promoting some government agenda dressed as community culture anonymously. Meaning that just who they are in government is not published. Just like David Walsh just happened to have worked in the Taxation Office. The one department over-seeing the installation of the casino, despite what they tell us. Whose claim to fame is supposedly beating this very casino. Now doing “billions in turnover a year” with his “syndicate”. So admirable. Have a go at gambling, why don’t you? That, folks, is another ruse put over you and the world. But one thing at a time.

The belief that the government has two or three opposing sides is false. I have just proven that to you, and will continue to do so below. When it comes to your safety and rights, they ALL remain silent. Rebecca White, the then leader of the opposition, answered me along the way, wishing me good luck in my getting the matter resolved with the ombudsman, and writing letters on my behalf [see below]. But as soon as the Governor General was implicated she went silent. Wouldn’t respond.

I have never in 10 years had any sincerity from any one of them. As we saw, they ALL hide. They hide even in the words the give off, which have a stench to them. Here they all are, for your records. Not to blame them or anything;

admin@govhouse.tas.gov.au, 

alison.standen@parliament.tas.gov.au,

andrew.jenner@parliament.tas.gov.au,

Andrew.Wilkie.MP@aph.gov.au,

anita.dow@parliament.tas.gov.au,

brian.mitchell.mp@aph.gov.au,

Bridget.Archer.MP@aph.gov.au,

bronwyn.watkins@dpac.tas.gov.au:
 minister.groom@dpac.tas.gov.au:
 pauline.allford@dpac.tas.gov.au:
 deputypremier@dpac.tas.gov.au:

cassy.oconnor@parliament.tas.gov.au,

craig.farrell@parliament.tas.gov.au,

david.llewellyn@parliament.tas.gov.au,

david.obyrne@parliament.tas.gov.au,

deputypremier@dpac.tas.gov.au:

Ella.Haddad@parliament.tas.gov.au,

eric.abetz@parliament.tas.gov.au,

tabatha.badger@parliament.tas.gov.au,

vica.bayley@parliament.tas.gov.au,

 miriam.beswick@parliament.tas.gov.au,

felix.ellis@parliament.tas.gov.au,

Gavin.Pearce.MP@aph.gov.au,

helen.burnet@parliament.tas.gov.au,

jacquie.petrusma@parliament.tas.gov.au,

jane.howlett@parliament.tas.gov.au,

janie.finlay@parliament.tas.gov.au,

jen.butler@parliament.tas.gov.au,

Jeremy.Rockliff@dpac.tas.gov.au,

jo.palmer@parliament.tas.gov.au,

josh.willie@parliament.tas.gov.au,

julie.collins.mp@aph.gov.au,

karin.hodel@education.tas.gov.au,

kristie.johnston@parliament.tas.gov.au,

lara.giddings@parliament.tas.gov.au,

leonie.hiscutt@parliament.tas.gov.au,

luke.edmunds@parliament.tas.gov.au,

madeleine.ogilvie@parliament.tas.gov.au,

meg.brown@parliament.tas.gov.au,

meg.webb@parliament.tas.gov.au,

Michael.Ferguson@dpac.tas.gov.au,

michael.ferguson@parliament.tas.gov.au,

Michael.gaffney@parliament.tas.gov.au,

michelle.obyrne@parliament.tas.gov.au,

Minister.Ellis@dpac.tas.gov.au,

Minister.Groom@dpac.tas.gov.au,

Minister.Ogilvie@dpac.tas.gov.au,

nick.duigan@parliament.tas.gov.au,

Pauline.Allford@dpac.tas.gov.au,

Rebecca.Beaumont@parliament.tas.gov.au,

rebecca.white@parliament.tas.gov.au,

rebekah.pentland@parliament.tas.gov.au,

rene.hidding@parliament.tas.gov.au,

rob.fairs@parliament.tas.gov.au,

rob.valentine@parliament.tas.gov.au,

roger.jaensch@parliament.tas.gov.au,

ruth.forrest@parliament.tas.gov.au,

sabina.mally@trb.tas.gov.au,

senator.carol.brown@aph.gov.au,

senator.chandler@aph.gov.au,

senator.colbeck@aph.gov.au,

senator.duniam@aph.gov.au,

senator.lambie@aph.gov.au,

senator.mckim@aph.gov.au,

senator.polley@aph.gov.au,

Senator.Singh@aph.gov.au,

senator.Tyrrell@aph.gov.au,

senator.urquhart@aph.gov.au,

senator.whish-wilson@aph.gov.au,

shane.broad@parliament.tas.gov.au,

Sue.Hickey@parliament.tas.gov.au,

vanessa.goodwin@parliament.tas.gov.au, 

NO EMAIL ADRESSES

Senator Catryna Bilyk

Wendy Askew

Craig Garland

You might think my emails just didn’t get through. Yes, that is the natural conclusion which they play to their advantage al la Ruth Forrest. I only send people polite emails, and over the years have checked on many, none were put in spam or disappeared. And they all have the same email server. Furthermore, the secretaries of many of the above did answer, saying they had forwarded my letter onto their respective ministers or senators. They read them, then they memory-hole them. Did Ruth really lose my two emails? How many emails have you lost? Emails that disappear after you read them. Did she really need to ask me to respect her? Are you kidding me!? How embarrassing for any normal human being. And wait till we meet young go-getter deeply-sorry Jack Cavanaugh not understanding the principles involved about an Ombudsman investigating himself, nor the actual issue; the Integrity Committee. Getting everything confused, just like Ruth, just like them all. Really? No, it is a psychological technique to scam passed you. And then stopping communication when I spell it out to them so even a child would get it. Does Micheal Gaffney really believe this issue about the nature of government is not his concern because I am not on his electoral role? Is he really that stupid? No! It’s called “mirroring” and it is where they string you along acting polite and concerned. All their letters begin with things like “Thank you for bringing this to my attention”. And a few other lies, and then they tell you they have addressed the issue. They know what they are doing. They are slipping around and scamming you left, right and centre. The one source pays them all and they cover each other’s backs. They are an incestuous family tree all the way back to even before Tasmania was declared. The ombudsman covers them all when push comes to shove, and they cover him back. But we have much more to see concerning this issue yet.

3

And so the question is; what should happen, in a perfect world?

Your correspondence with the Ombudsmany should of course be available to the public. All their dealings should be publicly accessible and the system kept to some degree honest. And this is why they have blocked that possibility. When I stated my intention to make my case public, I got this letter from one Megan Leary, Ombudsman lawyer. [By the way; I am pretty sure they do not use their own names—for reasons of being naturally hated. Thus has their office a plexiglass wall between the reception desk and the elevator. If they like you, the look of you, seeing that you are calm enough, they buzz to unlock the door].

Dear Mr Bell

… I note that the complaint was identified as a Public Interest Disclosure complaint. I have assessed your complaint and I regret to advise that it will not be accepted for investigation at this time.

You identified your complaint as a public interest disclosure complaint. This is a particular type of complaint that relates to the disclosure of information about improper conduct by Tasmanian public officers or public bodies. In order to be managed as a public interest disclosure there are a number of threshold tests that need to be met, including that the person making the disclosure is a public officer…

There you go. Are you in the club or not?

This “legal” insistence on secrecy is also embedded in their Acts; that list of wobbly laws and legalese they claim we have all agreed on. And if, as the case might be, you are rich and are ready to take the matter to court, you necessarily must sign a non-disclosure agreement for the matter to be settled. Yes, they act only under the protection of a non-disclosure agreement, ever. And you the public are left never knowing the true character of these people, your “government”. This is how it works. This is the system. The idea to make a casino to trick people from their family savings while getting them drunk came from this class of people that has always ruled Tasmania, though secretly. Yes, the first casino in Australia was in Tasmania. Very telling. What good did a casino ever do to a people? But they have this blanket sentence they smother all thought with; “Good for the economy”. Now the casino is here, they even don’t care that you believe that or not. How could a casino for the Tasmanian economy now be “a family owned business”? Yes, really, this is what the Farrells had up on their website until I made a joke about it and they took it down. They had to make the casino private so we couldn’t see where the money was going. It’s not rocket science, is it?

And there is something more to this dog attack situation that should concern you: If you are the victim of criminal negligence in Australia, such as I was, you will be denied by your own government the chance for compensation—while they will get payment. As noted, they do this by giving the offender an ‘infringement notice’, which is relatively recent phenomena of the last decade. This gives the criminal the choice of paying a fine or taking the matter to court. Meaning the criminal has the choice of how the matter is resolved, as opposed to you. Which means that the money paid in this fine is going to the police/government, while you are being denied a court hearing and possible compensation. The government is profiteering from your misery. The police have incentive to handle things this way, as do the perpetrators who could receive a criminal record and a much greater fine, a compensation payout, or imprisonment if you take them to court.

And this is what happened to me. And  [before I involved the Ombuds] I wrote to the police sergeant, telling him I wanted the matter to go to court. He phoned me, saying he would not let that happen “at this stage”. Saying that it was because my injuries were “relatively minor”. I asked him whether he had seen the police photos of the injury, and the video of the attack. He had. I asked what he would do if the dog had bitten a child, he said he was “not prepared to go into hypotheticals”. There you have it folks. Apparently the police are not there to protect us, which is a hypothetical, after all. I asked him what he had meant by “at this stage”, what would change his decision. He said he would need to hear from the Police Minister or the Police Commissioner. I wrote to them both. No answers from both. No acknowledgement of emails even, though the minister and I had corresponded before. And I later found out the Commissioner’s office had received and read it. Yes, no acknowledgement even. Their way to say “F#ck off!” when they feel they are safe from liability. As noted I had been denied bringing this matter up at a council meeting by the New Norfolk Genreral Manager Ron Sanderson, so then I informed many residents in New Norfolk about our council, by a letterbox drop of leaflets, with the link to a blog I wrote. The same police sargeant I had spoken to then appeared in  New Norfolk within a couple of weeks.

Sargent Tony Stewart at the moment of being introduced to the New Norfolk residents as the go-to man for all your crime concerns. Taken from a video they released of the event. I wasn’t invited. New Norfolk is booming, land being sold, houses being built everywhere.

And also noted, I was ignored by the mayor Michelle Dracoulis all the three times.

Here is Mayor Dracoulis outside Dracoulis’ Council, head over the door. Beside her is the state government representative for New Norfolk, Guy Barnett, now deputy premier. I have written to him several times too over the years. I even went into his office on High Street and asked his secretary to have him acknowledge my emails, the secretary taking down my phone number and email address. No effect. I have never seen Guy Barnett in New Norfolk the 10 years he was supposedly the representative. 99.9 % of the time his office was a dark closed space on High street, the main street. I saw it open just two or three times in 10 years. His giant grinning face always there on the glass [sometimes graffitied and renewed], never the actual man. Here [above] he can’t even match his pants with his jacket.

A photo op with a photo. And someone dressed for a funeral. The monarch appoints the Governor General who appoints the Ombudsman who protects people like Dracoulis, Barnett, Collins and Stewart. Making them untouchable.

I don’t talk about all this adult mess with my teenage daughter unless it is impinging on her. And she knows nothing about my opinion or stress with this mayor whom she actually knows personally. She was friends with her daughter, a year younger in primary school. And was captain of the school with Dracoulis’ son. But one day in a general conversation on other things, she mentioned how this Mayor’s daughter, then 15 years old, posts drug-related pictures and rap songs on Instagram. I got her to show me.

It seems like marijuana, doesn’t it? See the leaf structure on the right.

One of the rap album covers posted by her and played to the images. About the “artist” here we read at Wikipedia;

His mother struggled with substance abuse and alcoholism,[2] while his father, Hykeem Carter Sr., was not an active parental figure.[3] Carter was raised in Las Vegas, Nevada by his grandmother until the age of eight, …Carter also underwent eviction and was reliant on food stamps.

There you go. The mayor of New Norfolk’s culture. The woman who ignored my polite letters, all three. And a man who doesn’t mind blacking out the faces of his friends and or family. American role model.

And yes this is relevant to the agenda of escapism/Mona, the Tasmanian government and drink tourism. I will leave it at that though. And to quote the filth this girl is listening to would make you shudder.

So who is the Police Minister of Tasmania who ignored me?

This photo was taken from the Government Website. He is Mr Felix Ellis. And his resumé goes like this; Highschool, Plumber, Police Minister. It sounds like David Walsh’s rocket flight, doesn’t it? And this is to imply the same thing. That the system is fair that he was voted by the people, just a battler given a chance. Coincidentally the Ellises are right in the thick of Tasmanian power historically. He started politics at 28 years old. Current responsibilities;

Minister for Police, Fire and Emergency Management
 Minister for Skills, Training and Workforce Growth
 Minister for Resources
 Minister for Racing
 Leader of the House

He has 636 words about him at Wikipedia. David Walsh, absolute centre of media attention in Tasmania for 40 + years, and world famous, with “billions in turnover a year” from his “gambling syndicate” has 297 words. Something is wrong here, isn’t it?

Here is the Police Commissioner Donna Adams who also ignored me, with text from the police website;

Ms Adams’ strategic vision was behind her being named as 2014 Telstra Tasmania Business Woman of the Year for her work which saw Tasmania Police become the first police organisation to roll out mobile devices to the frontline.

Business Woman of the Year?! But it seems Telstra calls her that to disguise the term “biggest customer of the year”.

As a passionate Tasmanian, Commissioner Adams is committed to keeping Tasmanians safe.

And so two years later I saw her in the Hobart CBD walking along with her coffee, and after confirming who she was, asked her why she didn’t acknowledge my email. She said the email wouldn’t have gone to her. I asked why emails to her get intercepted and not acknowledged. She said she can’t look at every email sent too her, and asked what it was about. And when I said about the seargeant of Bridgewater police station, she said yes, it should have gone to her, she will look into it, and took down my name, email address and phone number, saying she would call me later that day. I said there was no hurry, she could reply in email. But she was adamant. 

An hour later she called me, confusing me from the start. She said that my letter was recieved and reviewed by the Assistant Commissioner and an answer sent on the 7^th of November. I told her I didn’t recieve it, thinking it was from the Assistant Commissioner. But I realised later when I checked my emails, that it was from Tony Stewart. Sound familiar? Like my complaints about the ombudsman being met with advice to go to the ombudsman from the very esteemed old Governor General. And Ruth Forrest’s junk mail. Others have done that too, one more to come. So I sent her this email;

Dear Police Commissioner Donna Adams,

….A letter was sent to me from Tony Stewart on the 7th yes. While my letter was to you about Tony Stewart. Do you see the problem? Not only that, when I wrote to you and him asking whether Tony Stewart’s letter was on your behalf, he and you didn’t answer. And neither did the minister for police.

Below I give you the first part of my letter, so you can be clear on the matter. Seeing that the letter was to you and about Tony Stewart….

Secondly, you said that my letter should have been acknowledged, as noted, but later on the phone you said that the assistant police commissioner need not acknowledge my email. That it was enough that he reviewed it. And that you need not give me his name. That his name is “irrelevant”

Are you happy to leave this matter as is? Or do you want to add clarification or correct any misunderstanding. Please do.

Thanks for your time,

From Gordon

No answer. And you can see it is the exact same situation as happened with the ombudsman and integrity committee also. They don’t want things in writing. If he had reviewed it, why not put out his opinion? And why wouldn’t she be proud of this fact, instead of keeping it hidden. It could be she made that up, that it got nowhere near her. It could be she herself reviewed it and ignored it. Who knows? Did you know you are not supposed to know the assistant police commissioner’s name?

Guy Barnett behind the premier. Next to him is someone half hidden by a head. Always hard to get right in photos. On the left is Nick Street. He ignored me when I wrote to him but he is supposedly responsible for councils. I informed Rebecca White, the then leader of the opposition party about this. She wrote to him for comment on my letter. He ignored her too. Some months later she wrote a second letter to him at my prompting, asking when she would likely get a response. He ignored this too. After a while I wrote to her. She told me to try the Ombudsman. See what I mean? Nick is big on gay-pride, as you might expect. Because the government class does not want any more procreation. They want populations down worldwide. Not by offering the young sobriety and romance to replace the sex-hype living for the drink which they foster, further diverting them from nature and wholesome mental health by questioning their existence. Pride in homosexuality is shame of heritage/procreation. Remember that, and tell your children while you are thinking about it. Because I understand that most parents leave their kids to find their way. I did, and will recount that too below. You can’t do that with a government that is guiding their thinking six hours a day, five days a week. The homo agenda is also for participation. Most or all of this government is some form of sexual deviant and or common money-lover, I believe. They must be.

In my second letter to Barbara Baker, current Governor General, I said I had much evidence against the Ombudsman. No interest from her. No role. No interest from anyone. And no interest from the ombudsman himself. If he even actually exists. So far I have no evidence of that, and he might be a face and a name, and not involved, living in a manor in England, for all we know, answering the occasional emails. And even finding out who he is supposed to be is not so easy. Search on Bing and Google and you get this;

Mr. Richard Connock

The Ombudsman for Tasmania is Mr. Richard Connock, who has been in the position since July 2014¹². The Tasmanian Ombudsman is an independent officer appointed by the Governor and answerable to Parliament³.

Learn more:

While on Wikipedia you get this;

The current Ombudsman from March 2012 is Leon Atkinson-MacEwen.^[10]

Press that footnote and it takes you to the Ombudsman’s website where you won’t learn who the Ombudsman is. At least at this time of writing. They agitate you between the concept of lawyers, and the actual man.

Our role

The Ombudsman is an independent officer appointed by the Governor, and answerable to the Parliament.

Our role is to investigate the administrative actions of public authorities to ensure that their actions are lawful, reasonable and fair.

How can he be independent and answerable to parliament at the same time? And how can he be independent while being paid by the government? And how can they jump from singular [“ He…officer”] to plural [“our role”] without pause? This is their style. Giving you constant warped writing to confuse and demoralise you away.

Richard Connock, the Ombudsman

Leon Atkinson MacEwen…the Ombudsman

So then, all this is a clue to what our government is, a corporate tyranny based on psychological projects and agendas. And it works by compartmentalising us and keeping us relatively poor, or in debt [a poverty called stress, mainly from renting, which the government tax wildy]– and confused and reliant on abstraction and futile escapism [Dark Mofo, drink, etc.].

Premier Jeremy Rockliff left. Recently getting his children’s name tattooed on his arm. As if that will help. It all makes sense to a rational mind, as paedophilia has been proven to be vastly overrepresented by gay men. They don’t tell you that one, do they? Still want to love and accept them?

From here; https://theinterim.com/issues/society-culture/study-shows-link-between-homosexuality-and-pedophilia/

“The report entitled Homosexuality and Child Sexual Abuse, shows that while homosexual men make up less than three per cent of the adult male population, they commit a disproportionate number (one third or more) of child sexual molestations….“

“…The link between homosexuality and pedophilia is rejected by many mainstream research groups, which have even begun to view pedophilia in value-neutral terms.“

Thinking about your kids in value-neutral terms.

So consider this when looking at that picture of your premier, or seeing a Tasmanian rainbow flag bus go by with the words “You are loved”. It is mind control. After a while you will start to believe you love these people. We all love each other and the system never questioned, these criminals never considered.

And if you think my other cases with the Ombuds were less illustrative of corruption, or trivial, think again. The first involved speedboats picking and dropping off people at a pier where children and adults were playing in New Norfolk ten years or so ago– and with the boats hooning past illegally where I and a few other adults were swimming farther out. I found the General Manager of New Norfolk didn’t even know where the boundary for speeding boats on the river was. And had it in his head that this was legal! Yes, didn’t know the laws of his own town. I spoke to him at the council reception desk and he seemed nervous for some reason [I wasn’t angry, no, just informing him]. He said he would investigate it and then had someone else write to me saying the river had nothing to do with the council, and I should contact Marine and Safety Tasmania [MAST]. Right, giving me a job to do. Yes, but I took it anyway, not long here in Tasmania and expecting some rationality and integrity. I talked to the General Manager of MAST on the phone, and when I mention swimming out he said “That’s not wise”. Yes, guessing about my swimming ability on this placid river. I knew he was a F.W from that moment, so I wasn’t going engage in an argument. with him. Just hear him out. “What you’ve got to remember“, he said “is that those pontoons are paid for by the revenue from the speedboats. Without that the pontoons wouldn’t be there”. I didn’t say that the river banks would still be there, and he went on to say that I should note the rego numbers of the boats that were hooning past–again giving me a job to do. All because my advice on putting signs up meant I was trying to muscle in on government and take over. He is still there, they are all still there, and always will be unless you pass this writing and similar around. Counter-act our compartmentalisation.

The next case was a teacher who had been teaching her school choir to sing songs about McDonalds, KFC and Pizza Hut, my 4th grade daughter included, who then falsely accused her of hitting another child in the face, some weeks after I complained about the song. A supposed act of violence never reported by this teacher to the school.  But told to my daughter, and only mt daughter, “You hit him in the face didn’t you, and you gave him a black eye”. A kid who had gotten “a black eye” which no one ever noticed, and which he, the child never reported either.  He made the allegation of hitting when he was at home a week later, and the mother complained. We went in to the school demanding to see the CCTV footage of the day in question, the principal agreed we all should view it. And then he emailed that it hadn’t been kept. And then–with now the Minister for Education and the Ombudsman involved– he appeared in front of me as a nervous wreck. I suspect he had seen the CCTV footage and the lie was exposed–and he was in a moral crisis. I always liked that principal, up to then. This singing teacher is probably the most respected one in the state of Tasmania, Sharee Bahr. She is also writing songs for children to sing, and recently broke some Guiness world record of 408 children [for Israel 1948 I’m guessing] singing one of her songs.  Like with New Norfolk Council, discussion was shut down. Elizabeth Humphries, head of the Education Department writing to me to say the principal will not be answering emails or discussing it further, the matter is closed. Why can’t a principal speak for himself?

The other case, also involving the Education Department, involved a different primary school giving our daughter a sex education lesson without our permission when she was in 5^th grade. They had deceitfully called this sex-education lesson ‘the growing up program’ in a letter home. Why change the name? Is ‘sex’ now a dirty word? It is for the guilty and perverted. And when it wasn’t signed and returned, the school included her in the lesson anyway.

Said the Education Department’s liaison officer;

 we are comfortable that the school has meet [sic] its legal requirements 

And that was that. They are comfortable, and I should be too. And it is all about legal requirements, rather than wrong or right. And that “we” was  written and signed off by Debbie Schofield-Gavin. I am giving you all the names while I can. Why not? It’s your children out there. You need to know who is really on your side, and who isn’t. Debbie thinks she has the right to teach your child what you don’t want her to. Remember, I was only asking for an apology. An admission this was the wrong thing to do. But these people have psychopathy. To her/them its a question of law only. Yet if it is a question of law, then why give notes out pretending that permission is needed by law? The law just doesn’t matter to them when that is convenient.  And of course that answer didn’t come easily. It took some re-asking and waiting.

They are all backed up by the government on every level.  Ever avoiding, ever staying silent when they can, and mis-answering questions. Do any of these things concern you? Do you want these homo creeps asking your child what a boy should do when he has an erection in class, and God knows what else? A few weeks later my daughter was given this flyer;

So what is this about? It’s the new disturbing idea of Christianity. The Christianity they have re-engineered. That is why nothing about Jesus is mentioned on the leaflet. It disturbed me so much I phoned the number and talked to the name, Gareth, asking if it was a Christian thing. Yes it was , he said. So why isn’t this mentioned on the leaflet? To which he answered;

“Does this concern you?”

“Obviously it does”

“Um, ah…You will have to talk to the organisers at UTAS”.

Why would that be? His name is on the flyer. But UTAS is corrupted too. I studied there and had a History paper so badly marked I asked for a second marking. In fact I am not sure it was totally marked at all, as the comments went less than a quarter of the way down the first page. And I had been given a mark of 50 out of 100. But that was nothing to the remarking which agreed with the scoring but left abundant more comments as evidence. Comments that were again inaccurate and incompetent. I sent in my marking of the re-marking comments to the dean of the faculty of History, and was asked by him in email to come to his office to discuss it. There you go. He didn’t want to put anything in writing either. I never went. And I left after the exams, without finishing the degree, but with all credits for year’s end scoring. And the university has a clause that you cannot publish your own essays and their marking in any way. You can never show the public the incompetence of these people. Sound familiar? This is Tasmania, the psycho state. The public will never know how much UTAS is a business pure and simple. In fact Tasmania itself is a business, and the incredible amount of immigrants you see here are all here on conditions of their visas, paying a huge sum to the Tasmanian government, they must come to Tasmania only. All renting of course, being taxed so much that Tasmania has always had the highest rents in Australia. Now they are trying an absurd festival we will look at somewhat soon, all to keep you drunk and stupid to their ways. And we will return to UTAS to see a professor of English being in the LGBTQ fake culture, pushing grand lies around from her blog.

So if none of these things are your concern, I have nothing to say to you. People like you make the government class possible. Slaves as dumb as dough, happy slurping in the trough of endless religious cynicism and oblivion, and paying them to destroy your mind on their alcohol. Your kids getting sucked in behind you. Alcohol being their main industry. But if you are a responsible member of society and or parent with a wholesome concern for fairness, then send me your email address in some way [A comment of even just a blank email], and I will have more writing for you in the future.

Ruth Forrest. Picture from her website.

Not from her website. Similar with Rosemary and Dracoulis, the  mayor of New Norfolk who aged 20 years when she updated her photo after voted in as mayor. [Yes you read that name right. Bitten by a dog next to Dracoulis’ council].

I want all those who have dealt with the ombudmany to send them me your correspondences , and I will send them to Amnesty International. Who knows?, they might be in the same sick bed, but they might not. We won’t know until we try. Send to positone@zohomail.com.au . Make sure it is ordered and dated correctly.

4

We saw above two women that work at Premier and Cabinet, Marita O’Connell and Sophie Muller. And there is yet another telling encounter with Premier and Cabinet people I have had. This was to do with the dog attack, and was before I wrote to the Governor General. I had been told that this department take complaints against town councils. So I wrote to them a report about my council experience after the dog attack, as you have read above. No answer. About three weeks after, I phoned them from a number given me by Service Tasmania, the open government office for the public here. A woman answered and went off to check. Yes, she said on returning, they have received my email and a response is coming. To whom, I asked, had she spoken to? Sorry, she said, they don’t give out names. Don’t give out names? Why not? Are they a criminal gang or something? And so anyway, nothing came. Now three months after this, I phoned again. She said she would redirect me now. Thank you. She redirected me to the Ombudsman’s Office! I talked on the phone to someone unaware they were the Ombusdman’s Office and there was some confusion for a while. And then I phoned the Department of Premier and Cabinet back and was re-directed again, to people who told they are an answering service for all government departments but not the Premier and Cabinet! And so I wrote to all the ministers, sending my same report about New Norfolk Council, as noted. I got silence. One of those ignorers was Nick Street, as noted, who, among ministers is supposedly responsible for councils. Ignored me, ignored Rebecca White writing on my behalf twice,. Worth repeating.

Weeks go by and still nothing comes from Premier and Cabinet. Then one Melanie Brown writes saying how sorry she was and thankful for my enquiry and that there was an administrative error, this caused the delay. And so, with some legal-sounding words, she pretended I had no complaint! Obviously someone there knew they had neglected to answer me at the start, and was now writing weeks after. Meaning they had known this for several weeks, at least, and now wrote to say it was all an administrative error. There was no administrative error at that time!

Busted.

My complaint to Premier and Cabinet also mentioned the council refusing to communicate at all about my complaints. And their refusal for letting me bring it up in a public council meeting. But in this letter from Premier and Cabinet’s Melanie Brown, 840 words, there was no mention of any of these things at all. Yes, and after months of delay and “filing error”. Check it out;

It is not within the remit of the State Government or the Office of Local Government to direct councils in their decision-making where they are properly exercising their statutory authority.

She too then directed me to the ombudsman, who she knew were now ignoring me, saying;

It is important to note that the Ombudsman will expect the initial steps in the resolution of a complaint to have been completed before a complaint will be considered – namely making a formal complaint to the Council directly.

Is she kidding? Or is she one of these nose people who might tell you anything they want?

The council’s General Manager, Ron Sanderson, as she knew, had even told me to not write to the dog officer MelCollins. And, as noted, this issue could never be brought up in a council meeting.

…namely making a formal complaint to the Council directly.

And she finishes as she began, with being very sorry for the “filing error”.

 I trust this information is helpful in clarifying the options available to you for engaging further with the council.

Once again, I do sincerely apologise for the delay in responding to your enquiry. Should you wish to discuss this matter further, please free [sic] to contact me as per my contact details below.

Now to the one person that did engage with me, out of the whole of the standing government, besides Suicide Mike. This was one Jack Cavanagh of the Greens Party, on behalf of the minister Tabatha Badger. I had sent him the description of the situation as with the others, everything you read in the first part of this document. Everything about the dog, the ombudsman, the police, the Governor General directing me to the Integrity Committee, the Integrity Committee ignoring me for 5 months. He directed me to the Ombudsman’s internal complaints department. Yes. Ending his letter with this;

I completely understand and sympathise with your frustrations in this time period. If you hear no response from the ombudsmen [sic] following this process, I would be very happy to bring up your issues with Tabatha in the new year and see if there is anyway [sic]we could assist further, although given this appears to be an internal matter with the ombudsmen [sic] I am not entirely certain there is anyway [sic] for us to be involved.

I replied that his pretending he didn’t understand the principles involved didn’t work on me. He replied;

[His grammar, not mine]

 
 Dear Gordon

Thank you for your reply and I hope you had a relaxing holiday season

I am deeply sorry you feel this way and wanted to respond to clarify what you mean by ‘principles involved.’ The information we were able to find was directly from the ombudsman service and theirguidelines/website. In particular it notes the time frame for their processes. I take it that you still have not received any correspondence or have asked [sic]for any update from the ombudsman based on your reply as well, so we are deeply sorry as well.
 
 The Governor of Tasmania is a merely ceremonial position and isresponsible for appointing an independent officer, who in turn is answerable to parliament. What has led you to believe there is clear corruption in the ombudsman procedures and is there any reason why they may not have responded to the initial complaint?
 
 If we can understand the nature of the complaint and the principles involved as you say then I believe we may be able to assist further and have a better understanding of your frustrations. Please let us know if this sounds agreeable to you and we will try our best to see how we might provide assistance.

To which I wrote;

My emails to you concern the Integrity Committee pretending to investigate the Ombudsman. The Integrity Committee is supposedly there to ensure moral principles in the Ombudsman/government, and is itself a principle of governing—supposedly, moral governing.

It was also apparent in my letters that this issue is past the idea of internal complaints, now involving the Govenor General and the Integrity Committee– so your adviceis irrelevant. I suggested that investigating oneself, as the Ombudsman claims to do via “internal complaints” is meaningless. The most internal phenomena there is in “The Ombudsman” is, yes, the ombudsman. So the trick doesn’t work on me, as also noted. 

To say the Governor General has a ceremonial role only, would mean she is deceiving me to take active part in my life, to direct my enquiry to the Integrity Committee. You can’t have it both ways Jack. I am in no one’s ceremony.

Lastly, please tell me why the minister can’t answer for herself.

Thanks,

From Gordon

To which he didn’t reply. But I sent something anyway. Seeing if he had any balls at all;

Dear Jack,

What’s the matter? It seems that, now you know what principles are, you have nothing to say. What a shame. And you started out so friendly! Remember how you were “deeply sorry” for the way I felt a month ago?  Well nothing has changed Jack, except my explaining things for you. Principles, yes.

By the way Jack, there are several grammatical errors in your political bio. Maybe get it proof read by a native English speaker.  

And how is Tabatha Badger? Still underground? 

Deeply,

From Gordon

No reply.

And by the look of his grammar, we can see he wrote his bio himself.

Politics as conversation. So why choose such a young and clueless man to be performing for a minister? Well, here’s the minister;

….She was too young, to fall in love. He was too young to know…

[That was joke for older readers]

These people go silent. They are all badgers and rodents underground and hiding. But we have a clue to how they begin. Jack was determined to not go silent, because he hadn’t yet learned this is the procedure, silence is inevitable. He will soon realise that it is better to just get off one short letter thanking and bla bla bla.

Once they know you are not fooled anymore, its silence. What can you do? There will always be people turning them off but only for someone different who is actually the same. There is someone there for everyone. The tension then the release. But it is tension and release pre-designed, and keeping you in their parameters of control. Embroilment. What issues matters more than what I am spelling out for you. And Ombudsman clearly not on your side. And I have much more evidence of their/his fraud I am not putting up here. As long as the main body stays, and you are embroiled, screaming and passionate, they have you. Don’t believe any one of them will ever have some new angle, new idea, its just not allowed. Such people won’t be funded, no money to campaign, and they won’t be acknowledged by media, the media they need. With “passionate” being a favourite word of all politicians.  Well, passionate enough to acknowledge emails? Not really. Their salaries are secure. And yes, Rebecca White who was on my side up to the Governor General, lost her voice. And every few years comes along her face, grinning from peoples’ yard signs. A beautiful blond whose grin just seems to be getting larger over the years. Guy Barnett, the minister for New Norfolk went to all lengths to ignore me, as noted. But I eventually started to receive spam mail from him. As if getting a “Hi Gordon” from any Jack is worth anyone’s attention..

5

Tasmania’s bogus economy.

There is no economy as they present it. There is no production industry in Tasmania other than what can be reaped from nature, and tricked from the world across the waters as the tourist industry. Everything is more expensive to manufacture here because the raw materials have to be shipped in. And even anything grown can be grown in Victoria across the strait, keeping the price down for buyers on the mainland. So how does the economy really work?

As noted, Dark Mofo is a tourist attraction pure and simple. And you have to understand that alcohol was Tasmania’s first industry, literally. All the families that still run Tasmania, though secretly, have a hand in this bowl. The first brewery in Australia was in Tasmania, In those times the people had a strictly monitored ration of rum to work with. Rum is made from sugar, and they weren’t going to be growing sugar here in Tasmania. Yet rum is potent and can be imported easily and cheaply. So the controller class, seeking profit as always, petitioned British parliament to be able to make beer, “in order to stop the soldiers getting drunk on rum”. If you cant see that as a scam, I have nothing to say. As time goes by, the timber, ship-building, sealing and whaling industries made Hobart boom. Then came farming, mining and textiles. But the whales and seals ran out, and mining proved unprofitable as the mainland took over that with giant easily accessible inland mines. And textiles died in the same way, mainland competition. All about the same time, or just before the timber industry went. As with the chocolate factory, which became fully automated. As with the zinc works which had been taking advantage of the cheap electricity from the first years of the hydro dam. [It is now subsidised]. The full scale timber industry lingered into the 1970’s and 80’s as people became more sensible about the forests and forced it to mostly shut down. What had happened to the Tasmanian forests? In the beginning they were making anything, including shipping crates out of fine old-growth forests. Trees hundreds of years old. And this caused the protest movement, which was essentially a world-wide protest against the Tasmanian government. But the government did their tricks and actually just diminished it out of view. They are still chopping old growth forests. All that was left was farming, a catamaran factory importing its materials, and alcohol and tourism. And a veritable nation of people called immigrants here paying for their visas–must be Tasmania. Paying our dear government for this chance. And I have personally met a woman who was picking blueberries as a slave, yes a slave, as she wasn’t making any profit from the franchise. Just doing it for her visa requirement. Third-world profit yes, but not what we would call profit.

And so they made the first casino in Australia in Hobart to bring in the tourists and trick them out of their family savings while getting them drunk. Bringing out one of their own from the tax office to front this and suppose the casino was beatable. A man made as outrageous and controversial as possible in order to advertise to a certain reckless, alcoholic and rebellious disposition, which their data showed was significant. Promising the Tasmanian people that this was for the Tasmanian economy, and not mentioning the suicides that come with casinos. Of course drinking and gambling go hand in hand, and some casinos have free drinks bars. So all this was logical for the greedy controllers. And so our hero genius gambler freak and controversy/fame maker just happens now to own a brewery and a distillery and a vineyard and a beer label and the biggest bar in the CBD. And to sip wine during interviews. And invent a festival that the government promotes online as “heady” [intoxicating] on their government website, as noted. These heady few days of the festival are a drink-up disguised as Paganism , which in turn is a dig at Christianity which traditionally promoted abstinence and moderation with alcohol. But it is far deeper than that. It was invented to target a whole swath of the population who hate or are cynical about all religions, and the notion of God. Just like they are themselves. Atheists loving money. Dividing the community and making them controllable under this, yet another issue. This is actually a huge market. It is all worked out by committees with access to all the data in the world about what the public think. But you are told and have believed it was one man’s idea. So they just move around the “artists” and let people think it is all organically formulated. No, it is specific to this sector of the population. That wouldn’t be such a problem if it wasn’t hijacking our money for themselves, this private business camouflaged as government, and snatching our attention in a cultural vacuum chamber. Leading our children astray from meaningful and wholesome working of gardens and other meditative and therapeutic pursuits.  It is the using of our taxes by the sicko atheists in government to further their wealth. And this money could be put to form real culture. If Dark Mofo looks interesting, its because real culture has been denied, and the pressure this puts on society is channelled. What they call art and thought provocation is just startling and weird things to stir your mind and let the alcohol in, and send you back out the other side with less money and braincells. But people generally never think in those terms. Because of mainstream media, which they own.

And, as with MONA, Dark Mofo is laced with some creepy, frightening and disconcerting stuff in order to advertise by controversy. To advertise not just in Tasmania but around the world to where the money flows are. They have toned this down recently because the family angle is more profitable, and people more desperate over the years to feel some sense of organised sociability they are ready to bring their kids. Something hitherto provided by the Church. “The more something annoys them [the public], the more they participate” said Walsh, misguiding you as always. What he is covering is that the more the public is denied wholesome culture, the more they will participate in anything, given that alcohol is involved. That is the correct way to look at this phenomenon. Hold onto it.

Welcome to Liquorland. The Home of Family-Friendly Gambling.

Part of David Walsh’s mythology is that he mastered and won millions at Keno too, after “developing a system”.

In Lieu of flowers, just send this writing on to others.

And for free updates, or the PDF version, or to receive new writing from me, send an email [a blank email will do], or to send me comments and or documents, write to;.

positone@zohomail.com.au

If you don’t want to send me your email address because I might hack into your bank account through it, you can check this blog periodically where I will add any updates, which I will indicate at the top.

I have just proven to you that you have less rights than a dog here in Tasmania. Doesn’t that require action? A lot is stacked against us but for your help.